- Delaware court allows Coinbase insider trading lawsuit to continue against executives.
- Shareholder lawsuit accuses Coinbase directors of using insider knowledge to sell shares.
- Coinbase faces scrutiny as insider trading claims and legal battles intensify.
A Delaware court has ruled that a shareholder lawsuit accusing Coinbase executives of insider trading can continue, despite a previous internal investigation clearing them of any wrongdoing. The lawsuit, filed in 2023, alleges that key Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong and board member Marc Andreessen, used confidential information to avoid over $1 billion in losses by selling their shares ahead of the company’s public debut in 2021.
The plaintiff claims that insiders, including Armstrong, who reportedly sold around $291.8 million worth of stock, took advantage of Coinbase’s direct listing to sell over $2.9 billion worth of shares. This listing, unlike a traditional IPO, did not have a lockup period, enabling insiders to sell their holdings immediately after the company went public. The shareholder alleges that the executives were aware of Coinbase’s inflated valuation and used that knowledge to sell their shares before the market corrected.
Despite an internal investigation by a special litigation committee, which cleared the executives of any misconduct, Delaware Chancery Court Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick ruled that the lawsuit could proceed. While the judge acknowledged the committee’s findings, she expressed concerns about the independence of one committee member, which raised enough doubts to keep the case alive. The committee had concluded that the stock sales were made to provide liquidity for the listing and were not driven by insider knowledge.
Also Read: Tether Reports $10B Profit in 2025, Expands with New USAT Stablecoin and Investments
Allegations and Defenses from Coinbase Executives
Andreessen, who joined Coinbase’s board in 2020, is also accused of selling approximately $118.7 million in shares through his venture firm, Andreessen Horowitz. The plaintiff argues that the directors knowingly profited from inflated stock prices, using their insider knowledge to avoid significant financial losses once the market corrected.
In their defense, both Coinbase and the executives have denied the allegations, arguing that there is no evidence they used material non-public information. Coinbase has expressed disappointment in the court’s decision, with the company stating that it will continue to fight the claims, which it views as baseless.
Coinbase’s special litigation committee spent 10 months reviewing the case before recommending that it be dismissed. The committee found no wrongdoing, stating that the trades were part of the direct listing process and aligned with the market’s movements. However, the plaintiff challenged the committee’s independence, citing a potential conflict of interest involving one of its members.
In addition to this lawsuit, Coinbase is facing new insider trading allegations related to potential profits from advance knowledge of upcoming token listings. The company has stated that it plans to adjust its listing process to improve transparency and reduce the risk of information leaks.
As this case progresses, Coinbase remains under scrutiny, with questions about its transparency and the actions of its executives continuing to emerge.
Also Read: Tether Reports $10B Profit in 2025, Expands with New USAT Stablecoin and Investments
