- XRP’s legal win reduced risk but didn’t create institutional rules, leaving banks without clear frameworks for large-scale use.
- The proposed CLARITY Act could bridge that gap by formally defining digital commodities vs. securities.
- True U.S. institutional adoption hinges on policy clarity, not court rulings, with legislation seen as the final unlock for XRP at scale.
Crypto researcher SMQKE has reignited discussion around XRP’s regulatory position, arguing that many market participants are conflating reduced legal risk with full institutional readiness.
According to SMQKE, XRP undeniably gained additional clarity following the conclusion of Ripple’s long-running legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as the ruling reduced uncertainty around XRP’s status in secondary market trading.
However, SMQKE emphasized that this legal progress does not automatically translate into clear, standardized rules for how banks and financial institutions should transact with XRP at scale. In his view, the absence of formal inter-institutional frameworks remains a key bottleneck for broader U.S. adoption.
Why the CLARITY Act Matters for XRP
Central to SMQKE’s argument is the role of the proposed CLARITY Act. He described the legislation as a critical missing puzzle piece that could bridge the gap between courtroom clarity and real-world institutional deployment.
The CLARITY Act is designed to codify definitions for different types of digital assets, explicitly distinguishing between digital commodities and digital securities. It also outlines conditions under which a digital asset may transition from one classification to another as networks become sufficiently decentralized.
Also Read: XRP Surge: Analyst Says XRP Will Start to Outperform BTC When This Happens
Something many are missing:
Does XRP have additional clarity post SEC lawsuit?
Yes.
Legal uncertainty was reduced.✅
Does the finance industry have clear institutional rules for XRP transactions?
Not yet.
Frameworks for inter-institutional use are still missing.🚫
This is… pic.twitter.com/ekX8bhuMmV
— SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) January 5, 2026
According to SMQKE, this approach directly addresses long-standing regulatory ambiguity that has made compliance difficult for financial institutions considering blockchain-based settlement systems.
Document Highlights Intent to Integrate Crypto Into Existing Systems
SMQKE shared a document alongside his tweet that reinforces this interpretation. The document explains that the CLARITY Act aims to “shoehorn crypto into existing regulatory frameworks instead of creating a whole new system.”
This point is particularly significant for institutions, as it suggests regulators intend to adapt current financial rules rather than force banks and compliance teams to navigate an entirely new regulatory regime.
The document also notes that the Act provides much-needed statutory guidance for market participants and compliance professionals, making the transition toward crypto-based financial infrastructure “much smoother” for the broader industry.
Adoption Depends on Policy, Not Just Court Rulings
SMQKE concluded that while XRP is no longer burdened by the same level of legal uncertainty, true institutional adoption depends on policy-level clarity rather than litigation outcomes alone.
In his assessment, the CLARITY Act represents a foundational step toward enabling compliant, large-scale XRP transactions within the U.S. financial system, potentially aligning regulatory structure with the infrastructure Ripple and the XRP Ledger were designed to support.
Also Read: Bitcoin Nears Rare Institutional Trigger That Once Drove 100%+ Rallies Again Now
