Florida Judge Thomas J. Rebull has issued a contentious order, commanding the removal of over 100 web pages tied to the legal dispute between TV legal commentator Kelly Hyman and her father, Arnold Alex Daoud. This sweeping decision not only requires the deletion of specific online content but also forbids negative remarks about Hyman and her husband, former judge Paul Hyman, alongside a ban on sharing related court documents.
Also Read: Ripple CTO David Schwartz Backs XRP Token Burn Over Complex Alternatives to Boost Network Economy
Judicial Decision Sparks Backlash
The order has ignited a fierce debate over free speech and jurisdictional overreach, as it affects content creators and platforms who were neither notified nor involved in the litigation process. Experts continue to state that due process was not followed since the content creators and platforms associated with the removed content were never informed or involved in the case being brought to court. Among the outspoken is Ripple CTO David Schwartz, who described the order as the “worst legal take of all time.” This comment led to a sharp retort from an X user, labeling Schwartz as the “most ineffective CTO of all time,” to which he cheekily replied, “Ripple is always hiring.”
The legal disagreement stems from a property ownership dispute between Hyman and her father, Daoud, a former Miami Beach mayor with a history of legal issues, including 41 accusations of bribery. Attorney Laura Powell provided thoughts on X, highlighting various problematic aspects of Judge Rebull’s ruling, including its ramifications for legal norms and constitutional rights.
Advertisement
The divisive court order has polarized community opinion, with some supporting the decision as a necessary measure to protect reputations, while others, like XRP advocate Bill Morgan, defend Schwartz’s stance on free speech and his contributions to the crypto community.
As debates continue, this legal drama underscores the delicate balance between protecting individual rights and maintaining free speech, highlighting the complex dynamics when legal boundaries and digital platforms intersect.