Despite a growing institutional engagement, Hong Kong’s virtual asset spot ETF has challenges because most banks are still dragging their feet due to regulatory matters and lacking talent.
Since the product was listed slightly over a month ago, the virtual spot asset ETF has become the center of rising attention within institutional investment circles. A financial services consultant, Chris Barford, pointed to this heightened awareness, pointing to the Ernst and Young poll, which disclosed that institutional investors are keen on increasing their exposure to virtual assets soon.
Although there is an excellent interest in ETFs among the traditional banks, they are still quite elusive in the ETF, as one would expect. To this end, Barford attributes this hesitancy to the perceived regulatory risk of anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) rules. Moreover, the apprehension reflects a noted lack of technical proficiency within the context of the TM, particularly among traditional banking organizations.
Read Also: Hong Kong Lobby Gears up to APPROVE 11 New Crypto Exchanges
Advertisement
Banking Sector’s Reservations and Challenges
It also highlights the general hesitance within the banking sector, as Hong Kong’s longest-serving virtual asset spot, ETF, continues to lack support from traditional banking. Barford explains the basis for this resistance, saying that incumbents deal with more complex considerations. These include the challenges of compliance with AML and KYC to the felt dearth of human resources capable of managing matters with virtual assets.
However, the issue of talent deficit is a major one not only for individual regions but also for the international financial market. Barford pinpoints that traditional financial institutions are on a collision course to meet increasing customer demands against the growing regulation of the virtual asset space.
Institutional Interest in Hong Kong’s Spot ETF and Future Trends
It is essential to note that institutional investors are starting to potentially incorporate virtual assets into their investment portfolios as a part of their investment. Based on Ernst and Young’s poll, Chris Barford’s information highlighted a rather discernible improvement in institutional habits of dealing with virtual assets in the next two to three years.
Large investors are considering investing about 1 percent of their assets into virtual currencies if the fund management crosses 500 billion US dollars and realizes that the investments offer above-average returns despite the relatively high fluctuations.
Some traditional financial institutions, especially from the banking sectors, have started observing the underlying technology of virtual assets with specific regard to innovations in their utility in payment, settlement, and custody of virtual assets. Tokenization is another critical trend brought into the limelight when HSBC hit the tokenized gold market to reach retail customers in Hong Kong. It expects the same to expand into other asset classes, such as real estate.
Conclusion
There are positive prospects and risks involved that Hong Kong’s financial industry needs to embrace with flexibility and strategy in light of the dynamic surroundings of virtual assets. Still, many more hurdles need to be cleared in the future, including regulatory issues and a lack of qualified professionals for expanding the usage of innovative products in spot markets. While these challenges persist in financial institutions, the future of virtual assets in Hong Kong seems uncertain but dynamic and prospective.
Read Also: Ethereum (ETH) Takes a Hit Amid Mixed Updates: Analysis
