- Hut 8 agreed to settle USBTC merger investor lawsuit claims.
- Investors alleged undisclosed King Mountain risks and financial disclosures.
- Court narrowed claims before settlement while Hut 8 denied.
Hut 8 has reached a $2.35 million settlement in a securities lawsuit linked to its merger with U.S. Bitcoin Corp. The proposed agreement would resolve claims that the bitcoin mining company failed to adequately disclose risks tied to the transaction completed in 2023.
According to a court filing submitted in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the settlement covers investors who purchased or acquired Hut 8 securities between Feb. 13, 2023, and Jan. 18, 2024. However, the agreement still requires court approval before becoming final.
Despite agreeing to the settlement, Hut 8 denied all allegations raised in the lawsuit. The company also stated that it did not violate securities laws or mislead investors regarding the merger.
Also Read:Â XRP Analyst EGRAG Says Current Weakness May Be Building Bigger Setup
Investor Claims Focused on USBTC Disclosures
The dispute centered on Hut 8’s all-stock merger with U.S. Bitcoin Corp., commonly known as USBTC. Investors alleged that the company failed to disclose operational challenges linked to King Mountain, a Texas bitcoin mining venture in which USBTC held a 50% stake before the merger closed. Plaintiffs also argued that Hut 8 misrepresented USBTC’s financial condition while seeking approval for the transaction. According to the lawsuit, shareholders lacked important information that could have influenced their investment decisions.
The case gained wider attention after J Capital Research published a report on Jan. 18, 2024. The report questioned several statements surrounding the merger and highlighted alleged issues at the King Mountain operation. Hut 8 shares fell more than 23% on the day the report was released. Nevertheless, the company rejected the report’s conclusions and described it as an effort to spread misinformation.
Court Decisions Reduced the Scope of the Case
The lawsuit became significantly narrower before both sides agreed to settle. In September 2025, Judge Victor Marrero dismissed all Exchange Act claims brought by investors. He also rejected Securities Act claims tied to alleged misstatements about USBTC’s financial condition before the merger.
However, the court allowed a limited group of claims to proceed. Those claims focused on whether merger documents adequately disclosed infrastructure and operational risks at the King Mountain facility. As the litigation continued, Hut 8 prepared additional legal defenses. The company planned to argue that investors could not directly trace their shares to the merger registration statement because registered and unregistered shares became commingled following the transaction.
According to plaintiff attorneys, those legal risks reduced the likelihood of a larger recovery. Consequently, they supported a settlement rather than extending the litigation process. Court filings show the $2.35 million settlement represents approximately 19.6% of the maximum estimated recoverable damages of $12.08 million. Plaintiff counsel also noted that the recovery exceeded both the median and average outcomes for Securities Act-only settlements recorded during 2025.
Also Read: Crypto Market Holds Firm as Bitcoin Nears $64,000 While Altcoins Show Mixed Moves
